Who Offers Forgiveness?

The pope himself cannot remit guilt, but only declare and confirm that it has been remitted by God. -Martin Luther, Thesis #6, 1517

Last week Pope Francis announced that for a year priests are allowed to forgive the sin of abortion. His motivation is compassion for those who have felt, for one reason or another, the need to terminate the life of their child. As far as I can tell, this is a well meant expression of mercy… with one huge theological problem: neither the papacy, nor the church can limit or dictate forgiveness for sins.

The practical reality of life on the ground for Roman Catholicism is that the Roman Catholic Church, via its leadership, is the dispenser of God’s mercy to people. When we look to the Bible, however, we find that it is God alone who may forgive sin.

Recall the famous incident in Capernaum from Mark 2. Jesus is preaching in a home and it was so crowded there was no room for anyone to get in. Four friends of a man paralyzed got creative and lowered their friend through the roof (awesome moment, by the way). Jesus looks at the man and says, “Son, your sins are forgiven” (Mark 2:5).

When he said this, the religious leaders of the community in attendance took offense. Jesus was blaspheming! They knew that only God can forgive sins (Mark 2:7). Jesus, aware of their attitude, objects to their objection. He asks which is harder, to say “your sins are forgiven” or “rise, pick up your bed, and walk.”

Side note: which is harder? In that moment, the speech act of forgiveness seems easier because it cannot be visually verified, and the healing seems “harder” in the sense that it cannot be faked and will yield empirical evidence. However, surely a righteous God forgiving sin is harder than the Creator of the universe healing a broken body. I digress…

Crucially, Jesus does not object to their premise; he agrees: only God is able to forgive sins. Instead, he proves his own right to forgive sins by performing the healing: “‘But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins’—he said to the paralytic— ‘I say to you, rise, pick up your bed, and go home’” (Mark 2:10-11). Jesus says I will prove to you I am God, and therefore that I can indeed forgive sins.

Back to the issue at hand. If the Pope can declare certain sins forgivable for certain times, why wouldn’t he declare all sins forgivable at all times? This is exactly what Martin Luther was asking in Thesis #82, “Why does not the pope liberate everyone from purgatory for the sake of love (a most holy thing) and because of the supreme necessity of their souls?” It was a rhetorical question (and for the record purgatory is another RCC doctrine that is shockingly absent from the Bible). The short answer is, because the pope doesn’t forgive, only God does.

But aren’t there passages where Jesus gives the church authority to forgive? What about John 20:22-23? In that passage Jesus says to his disciples: “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you withhold forgiveness from any, it is withheld.” Jesus is giving the church the authority to preach the gospel, and therefore offer forgiveness to sinners via the gospel. There’s a huge difference between announcing forgiveness of sins and accomplishing forgiveness of sins.

The disciples announce forgiveness by preaching the gospel. If a person repents and believes, the disciples can affirm “you are forgiven”—not because of church policy but because of the cross of Christ. If someone rejects the gospel and refuses to repent and believe, the disciples can accurately announce, “you are not forgiven”—not because of their power, but because the person has rejected God’s vehicle of forgiveness: the gospel.

Forgiveness is not a function of the church, but of the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. In Colossians Paul writes, “He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins” (Colossians 1:13-14). In 1 John the apostle John writes, “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9). Forgiveness is God’s work.

Priests don’t need permission to forgive sins, because they don’t do it. Jesus died to pay the penalty for sin and conquered death in resurrection; therefore any person can be forgiven by confessing their sin to God and turning to Jesus in faith. Or, in the words of Martin Luther:

Any Christian whatsoever, who is truly repentant, enjoys plenary remission from penalty and guilt, and this is given him without letters of indulgence. -Martin Luther, Thesis #36, 1517

The wrong of abortion may be forgiven because of the cross of Jesus Christ, and don’t let the pope tell you otherwise. God’s grace is sufficient, and it’s available all the time.

Love > Like

Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.

-Ephesians 5:25

My daughter Kate said it. “Love is more than like.” That is a six year old explaining to a four year old the semantic difference between “love” and “like.” Simple. Effective. Brilliant.

15 years ago Lindsay and I were married. I liked Lindsay from the first days we spent time together in college (Hotchkiss lounge at TMC, thank you Andy and Beth Lichtenberger!). It didn’t take long before I knew that I loved her. 15 years and 4 kids later, I am still learning that love is more than like.

God calls me not merely to like Lindsay, but to love her as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her. Like doesn’t result in sacrifice. Like doesn’t put others first. Like doesn’t lead to confession and repentance. Like doesn’t mean unconditional commitment. Love does. Jesus loves us that way, and I am learning to love Lindsay that way. I have a long way to go.

Love has so much bound up in it: will, emotion, decision, sacrifice, choice, attraction, commitment. 15 years into this game, I’m more aware than ever that love > like.

Lindsay is a precious gift of God to me… a gift that I often take for granted. How awesome are her mom skills? How patient is she? How real is her faith? There’s so much to like about Lindsay: she’s a beautiful, intelligent, soft spoken, remarkably capable woman who walks by faith. But love is more than like. I love you, Lindsay!

(The photo above is one of my favorites of Lindsay in Jerusalem… she’s a rock star!)

The Day After

As it should be, many leaders in the evangelical Christian community have been responding to the US Supreme Court’s decision to legalize same sex marriage in all 50 states. Here are links to some helpful posts:

Al Mohler (president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary)

John Piper (I really liked this one)

Kevin DeYoung

Denny Burke (a special word to pastors)

As far as GPBC goes, we are currently working on recommendations for any needed changes to our doctrinal statement and policies and procedures. You will hear more on these in the coming weeks.

As far as I am concerned, my convictions regarding marriage and sexuality have not changed and will not change. God has spoken directly regarding what pastors should do in times such as these in 2 Timothy 4:1-5,

I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom: preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching. For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths. As for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.

By God’s grace I will continue to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ: God loves sinners enough to send his Son to die in their stead, and anyone who repents of their sin and puts their faith in Jesus will receive his eternally life changing grace. Jesus is the judge I answer to.

Identity Crisis

The homosexual shift in American culture has taken a confusing turn regarding identity. People today are increasingly asserting their “identity rights.” But this movement has major logical flaws. In the end, it comes crashing head first into the concept of God as Creator. Where do we find identity?

I Cannot Choose My Identity

The main assumption behind the homosexual civil rights movement has been that we cannot choose our identity. Our sexual attractions are part of our DNA, and though they may change, we are powerless to change them. So position one has been “I can’t choose my identity, and therefore I have a (civil) right to live according to my desires.” Seems straightforward enough.

I Can Choose My Identity

In recent days, however, the issue of gender identification has pragmatically resulted in the opposite viewpoint. We are a free society, and the argument is that people have the right to choose the gender (or even ethnicity?) with which they identify. We now have vocabulary words like transgender, which, according to the American Psychological Association is:

an umbrella term for persons whose gender identity, gender expression or behavior does not conform to that typically associated with the sex to which they were assigned at birth.

Therefore, we can choose our identity. So Bruce Jenner can become Caitlyn Jenner as a matter of freedom. What could be more American? Surprisingly, America has been less enthusiastic about embracing Rachel Dolezal’s right to identify with a different ethnicity, but this is shockingly inconsistent. Position two is logical: “I have the right to choose my identity.”

Put side by side, these two positions are mutually exclusive. Either we cannot choose our identity, or we can. Yet our culture is affirming both simultaneously. This requires us to redefine gender culturally rather than physiologically, and to insist that sexual attraction is different than gender identification.

Common sense dictates against both maneuvers. Even undergoing hormone therapy and sex change operations, the chromosomal makeup of a human can’t be changed. Gender is necessarily biological. Furthermore, gender and sexual attraction are integrally related. Part of diagnosing gender association is considering sexual desire. If someone cannot choose their sexual desires, but can choose which gender they identify with, they have a decision making matrix to work through: if you are a male attracted to males then you may choose to identify as a homosexual male or as a heterosexual female, physiology not withstanding. At this point we are pretty far down the rabbit hole. Either you can or cannot choose your identity.

My Identity Is Broken

The identity discussion in our culture has a noticeable gap: considering God as Creator. The Biblical narrative for humanity assumes that God, as our Creator, has determined our identity. Genesis 1:27 reveals,

So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.

Note that gender, determined physiologically, is part of the foundational description of the creation of humanity. To assume the right to decide gender is to attempt to steal a prerogative that belongs to God, and it is therefore idolatry. On the other hand, to assert that God creates us with homosexual attraction misses the next part of the Biblical narrative: sin.

After sin entered the world, gender relationships within humanity were broken. This is made clear by God’s statement of consequence to Eve in Genesis 3:16,

Your desire shall be for your husband,
and he shall rule over you.

This may refer to sexual desire, or more likely to a redefinition of God’s design for roles within marriage, but either way sin has created gender problems. The modern American confusion regarding gender and sexuality is simply another symptom of the sin problem.

Ultimately, every human’s identity comes from God, including gender, ethnicity, DNA, etc. But every human’s identity is also broken because of sin. We need a solution. We need a new identity.

I Need a New Identity

At this point the Bible offers a solution, and it is neither in justifying an identity broken by sin, nor in seeking to claim God’s right to establish identity. The Bible’s solution is to make individuals new in Christ, giving them a new identity. We read in 2 Corinthians 5:17,

Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come.

This passage details Jesus’ reconciliation ministry- Jesus is making sinners new by paying for their sins and fundamentally changing them. This truth is also expressed in Galatians 3:28,

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

In Galatians Paul is primarily addressing ethnicity issues (Jew and Gentile). In Christ, neither ethnicity, nor social status, nor gender ultimately defines us. Rather, we are now a new creation in Christ. This doesn’t mean we aren’t still Jews or Greeks, or slaves or free, or male or female (consider Paul’s instructions to slaves and masters, or husbands and wives in Ephesians). It simply means that in Jesus we are now made new. We have a new identity as a follower of Jesus.

Fundamentally, we all need a new identity—not one that we create, but one that God has provided for us in Jesus. The phrase “new creation” is significant, because it assumes God is still our Creator. Life is far less perplexing when we follow the Creator’s design rather than try and re-design ourselves. Our identity crisis can be solved, but not by us. It is only in Christ that we are made new.